AwardCove
ENDE
Open your workspace ↗

SOURCE-LINKED TENDER REVIEW · PRIVATE IN YOUR BROWSER

Find what needs review. Verify the source.

Manage your tender projects and deadlines in one workspace, with a guest mode or optional verified account. Review PDF sources locally; your documents are not uploaded to your account.

Try the working source review Compare my own PDFs

Manage your tenders and deadlines ↗ · Reopen a saved PDF review ↗

No document uploadOriginal page citationsCSV for your bid team

English interface available. Keyword coverage is strongest for German-language procurement documents; other languages may be under-detected. Not an eligibility decision. Limits and privacy.

Browser-local PDF analysis
Original text and page
Repeated topic review
Portable review project

EXPERIENCE THE PRODUCT

Find it. Compare it. Follow up.

From two documents to a source-linked worklist. Review every finding yourself.

01 · ONE TENDERPrivate

What's mentioned in this tender?

Review candidate references to insurance, certificates, required documents and deadlines in one or more tender PDFs. Check the extracted passage before making any decision.

Open single-tender PDF checker →
02 · REPEATED BIDSCore workflow

What appears again in the next tender?

Choose two PDFs within one client context. Compare source-linked keyword groups, document manual follow-up and resume later from a locally saved review file. No cloud document storage.

Compare my own PDFs →
03 · NO DOCUMENTSImmediate

Show me a real-source example.

Open the TED sample without uploading anything. The notices illustrate the comparison interface, not complete bidder qualification documentation.

Explore the source-backed demo →

From a PDF to questions your team can review

From a document to a reviewable source.

Shorten the initial search and keep human judgement where it belongs.

01

Choose a document

Open your text-based procurement PDF in the browser, or select two to compare. Scanned images and protected files may not be readable.

02

Check original passages

Inspect the cited page and excerpt for each category. A keyword mention is not proof of an enforceable eligibility criterion.

03

Resume the next review

Add manual notes, download one local review project and resume in another browser session. Reattach original PDFs by SHA-256 to restore source links. A professional still verifies the full tender package.

Built with constraints in the open

Private by design. Explicit about what it can't decide.

Your selected PDF contents are processed in the browser and are not uploaded to the AwardCove server. Optional coarse, anonymous action counts may be recorded; they do not include document text. The prototype has no user accounts or paid checkout.

Read the data-use policy →

What is availableCandidate term matching, source excerpts, manual review aids and export of local findings.
What it cannot guaranteeComplete discovery, legal eligibility, exact evidence equivalence, OCR of scans, or safe bid/no-bid recommendations.
What isn't for saleNo paid plans or checkout are available. Any published pilot prices are unvalidated research hypotheses.

Provenance before marketing

Original procurement sources, not invented customer stories.

Our public research includes cited official TED notices naming IT bidding groups and a separately assembled manual evidence matrix. These sources establish what is documented publicly — they do not establish that anyone saved time, became a customer, or would pay us.

Explore the cited TED research →Inspect the manual evidence case →
30Official notices in the scoped consortium research collection (2024–26)
32Manually catalogued sample evidence tasks from three IT notices
Research samples are partial, not a tender-market census, automated extraction benchmark or validated commercial demand.